Go Back   Planet Minis > Forum > General Talk > NSR50, NSF100F, MB5, NS1 and RCV Mini

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-27-2009, 09:10 AM   #41 (permalink)
1st Gear Member
 
reefmuncher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 122
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by NCNSR View Post
This is a Lipps cylinder

That'll work, though guess grinding burrs must be expensive in Japan cause what's with leaving everything unfinished!?!

I was thinking about ordering one of their 100cc bigbore options, but I'm beginning to think I'll do it myself by ordering some oversize pistons!
reefmuncher is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 09-27-2009, 09:14 AM   #42 (permalink)
Mod formerly known as Culdesac
 
NCNSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Garden City, N.Y.
Posts: 945
My Mood: Cynical
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by reefmuncher View Post
That'll work, though guess grinding burrs must be expensive in Japan cause what's with leaving everything unfinished!?!

I was thinking about ordering one of their 100cc bigbore options, but I'm beginning to think I'll do it myself by ordering some oversize pistons!
I guess the bottom line is Autoboy is mass producing stuff(There stuff is available everywhere)Amazon Japan/Yahoo Auctions/Numerous retail outlets,They are sloppy.As opposed to Lipps which you can only get there stuff through them........RepsolNSR should be getting his Malossi this week and i will suggest he have the auxiliary intake ports done when he sends it out......

Last edited by NCNSR; 09-27-2009 at 09:48 AM.
NCNSR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 09:44 AM   #43 (permalink)
PM Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 72
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by rjpracing View Post
f.y.i. you guys know you can change port timing on these engines by lowering the height of the piston on the exaust port side which in turn raises the exaust port for more top end? cheaper than moding cylinders for testing so you get it right before you grind cylinders. since we are talking about 2strokes. its what we use to do to my pcr race kart engines back in the day.
I don't think you want to do this. The cylinder already sits too high. The base gaskets are .5 mm so it is difficult to lower the cylinder so you are pretty much forced to hit the milling machine. The stock cylinder is not too bad with the thicker base gasket....


But the kitaco overshoots the ports.....



And the athena is even worse...



The old trick of raising the cylinder with a thicker base gasket to get more top end probably will not work in these cases because the cylinders are already way too high.
johnson05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 09:48 AM   #44 (permalink)
PM Newbie
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 72
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Just some additional information. Almost all the Japanese cylinders are just reworked 50cc boat anchor stock cylinders including the kitaco. The athena is aluminum. Cylinder weights are as follows..
Stock 2.1 kg
Kitaco 1.8 kg
Athena .7 kg
johnson05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 09:52 AM   #45 (permalink)
Mod formerly known as Culdesac
 
NCNSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Garden City, N.Y.
Posts: 945
My Mood: Cynical
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnson05 View Post
Just some additional information. Almost all the Japanese cylinders are just reworked 50cc boat anchor stock cylinders including the kitaco. The athena is aluminum. Cylinder weights are as follows..
Stock 2.1 kg
Kitaco 1.8 kg
Athena .7 kg
I always thought the Kitaco was Aluminium?

(also great info)
NCNSR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 06:07 PM   #46 (permalink)
PM Newbie
 
minirazor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: So Cal LA
Posts: 52
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Do both heads have the same squish band? and have you measured head volume??
minirazor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 06:28 PM   #47 (permalink)
Mod formerly known as Culdesac
 
NCNSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Garden City, N.Y.
Posts: 945
My Mood: Cynical
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by minirazor View Post
Do both heads have the same squish band? and have you measured head volume??
They are totally different,Just by eye the head volume on the Autoboy is considerably less..............There that different,The Autoboy is about as high compression as they come,The head has even been cut down alot more than the Malossi. I took pics from this angle so you could see the Width,Depth and Contour of the combustion chambers,The Autoboy head is on the left



Last edited by NCNSR; 09-27-2009 at 06:33 PM.
NCNSR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 08:22 PM   #48 (permalink)
PM Newbie
 
Jeff Lebowski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 16
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnson05 View Post
Almost all the Japanese cylinders are just reworked 50cc boat anchor stock cylinders...
This is what I was wondering when I asked NCNSR if the Malossi cylinder is a custom piece. It just looks too much like a breathed on stock barrel to be a clean sheet design.

EDIT:
Quote:
Originally Posted by ncnsr on BARF View Post
The Lipps can only be bought directly from them... The downside being it dosent come with a Timing key/Head or plug and adapter as the Autoboy does.
Can you explain the timing key included in the kit? (I think we may have spoken about this before.) Will you have to modify the crank and/or the flywheel to accept the key in a different location to therefore change the timing? Are you using a different ignition altogether that can make use of said key?

Last edited by Jeff Lebowski; 09-27-2009 at 08:38 PM.
Jeff Lebowski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 08:39 PM   #49 (permalink)
Mod formerly known as Culdesac
 
NCNSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Garden City, N.Y.
Posts: 945
My Mood: Cynical
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
This is what I was wondering when I asked NCNSR if the Malossi cylinder is a custom piece. It just looks too much like a breathed on stock barrel to be a clean sheet design.
The key word here is Japanese,The Malossi is Italian,Without betting my children on it i would say the Malossi is a Brand New Casting.There are subtle differences between the two as shown in the pics.I dont know if this is because they are made of a different material,Cast Iron/Steel or because they are both Honda cylinders from a different series GT3/GT4 etc etc.Or because they are in fact totally different?
I think what Johnson meant was Autoboy,Lipps,Burial,Chameleon Factory, Kitaco. I am not so sure about Malossi and Parmakit.


Last edited by NCNSR; 09-27-2009 at 08:58 PM.
NCNSR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2009, 09:06 PM   #50 (permalink)
Mod formerly known as Culdesac
 
NCNSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Garden City, N.Y.
Posts: 945
My Mood: Cynical
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

I will post pics of the Key and instructions tomorrow apparently you take out the Honda key and replace it with the new one no modification needed,It appears to be offset by about 3mm.I have a Posh racing CDI,Posh Coil and the kit comes with a NGK ER8EH plug.

Last edited by NCNSR; 09-27-2009 at 09:24 PM.
NCNSR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 05:20 AM   #51 (permalink)
1st Gear Member
 
reefmuncher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 122
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Yeah the Malossi kits are new castings as are many of the other Italian / Spanish brands. It just lets them start with a clean slate and create port combinations which they feel are better for the performance they want to achieve. Not all the time will they be for topend racing performance, some are just to be a cheaper lower cost option, or else a gruntier more lowend option.

Typically the Malossi, Polini, Italkit, Metrakit types were know for racy performance where the Autisa, Eurocilindro, Zeta ones good (and not so good) low cost options. Some of the later kits could be pretty bad with very uneven port heights or have port work which would need to be totally changed to even match a stock block.

I don't know a whole lot about the 50cc engine options, but my Euro friend did mention that the general consensus was the 50cc engine was better in design than the 80cc engine for extracting good performance!? Or at least I think he meant cc for cc? I think it would make sense as if you look at the best twostroke race engines they tend to be square configurations.

So 54mm x 54mm for racing 125 engines and so with a 41.4mm stroke the 80cc engine bore is already 49.5mm and just gets bigger with 53mm and 55mm kits. With portwork designed to flow for a smaller engine the bigbores struggle at higher revs.

If there was some easy way to fit the Italkit 75cc to the 50cc engine, that would be a good combo in IMO as that kit has really awesome precise portwork (like motox cylinder) and is cast aluminium. When I sent pictures to my friends in Japan they were very impressed and shocked at the reasonable price!!

Last edited by reefmuncher; 09-28-2009 at 05:23 AM.
reefmuncher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 08:40 AM   #52 (permalink)
Mod formerly known as Culdesac
 
NCNSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Garden City, N.Y.
Posts: 945
My Mood: Cynical
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by reefmuncher View Post
Yeah the Malossi kits are new castings as are many of the other Italian / Spanish brands. It just lets them start with a clean slate and create port combinations which they feel are better for the performance they want to achieve. Not all the time will they be for topend racing performance, some are just to be a cheaper lower cost option, or else a gruntier more lowend option.

Typically the Malossi, Polini, Italkit, Metrakit types were know for racy performance where the Autisa, Eurocilindro, Zeta ones good (and not so good) low cost options. Some of the later kits could be pretty bad with very uneven port heights or have port work which would need to be totally changed to even match a stock block.

I don't know a whole lot about the 50cc engine options, but my Euro friend did mention that the general consensus was the 50cc engine was better in design than the 80cc engine for extracting good performance!? Or at least I think he meant cc for cc? I think it would make sense as if you look at the best twostroke race engines they tend to be square configurations.

So 54mm x 54mm for racing 125 engines and so with a 41.4mm stroke the 80cc engine bore is already 49.5mm and just gets bigger with 53mm and 55mm kits. With portwork designed to flow for a smaller engine the bigbores struggle at higher revs.

If there was some easy way to fit the Italkit 75cc to the 50cc engine, that would be a good combo in IMO as that kit has really awesome precise portwork (like motox cylinder) and is cast aluminium. When I sent pictures to my friends in Japan they were very impressed and shocked at the reasonable price!!

Generally in europe it seems as though for these bikes the Malossi is preferred with the Parmakit Alloy cylinder http://www.parmakit.com/cpz22/jsp/co...TID=0000000226 second......I know the Athena for the ACO8E is considered crap in europe and Racerxxx221 has a Zeta he feels is crap..........I dont think alot of people appreciate the Malossi cylinder for what it is...........

Last edited by NCNSR; 09-28-2009 at 09:08 PM.
NCNSR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 10:31 AM   #53 (permalink)
1st Gear Member
 
reefmuncher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 122
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Yeah Malossi make some good stuff, for the NSR's seem to rule!

Here's a picture of a really old Malossi 93cc for the 80cc engine. It'll be from around 1990 or so. At the time we were blown away as it was so racy and high performance compared to the stock block. I don't know if the 50cc pistons still have slits between the crown and the gudgeon pin, but the 93cc ones still do and that's for the additional port below the transfer ports. I seem to remember many of their kits had this feature, could be possible the old Malossi kits for the 50cc engines had this also?

The current Malossi 93cc kit is basically the same but without this extra set of ports and the exhaust is 1mm lower with a more durable 2 ring piston. Just wished they updated and cast them in aluminium and fitted a bridged exhaust port!!

(note this block was unfortunately butchered, so not much value in it really)


Last edited by reefmuncher; 09-28-2009 at 10:37 AM.
reefmuncher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 11:34 AM   #54 (permalink)
PM Newbie
 
minirazor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: So Cal LA
Posts: 52
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by NCNSR View Post
They are totally different,Just by eye the head volume on the Autoboy is considerably less..............There that different,The Autoboy is about as high compression as they come,The head has even been cut down alot more than the Malossi. I took pics from this angle so you could see the Width,Depth and Contour of the combustion chambers,The Autoboy head is on the left


The head on the right (MALOSSI) seems to have a bigger bore size, is that so??
minirazor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 12:03 PM   #55 (permalink)
2nd Gear Member
 
fireman_343's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Blacklick Ohio
Posts: 358
My Mood: Daring
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

I have some pic's of the Athena cylinder transfer ports and intake/exhaust ports somewhere.. I'll have to go look on my desk top and see if I have the pictures on there? I do remember that they were a little bit bigger then the Kitaco cylinder when looking at them side by side.

A lot of great info being passed on here!!
fireman_343 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 12:38 PM   #56 (permalink)
Mod formerly known as Culdesac
 
NCNSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Garden City, N.Y.
Posts: 945
My Mood: Cynical
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by minirazor View Post
The head on the right (MALOSSI) seems to have a bigger bore size, is that so??
That is because of the Stepped piston in the Autoboy kit........It fits like a glove,I wouldnt dare run this bad boy on anything less than 100 octane.........


Last edited by NCNSR; 09-28-2009 at 12:50 PM.
NCNSR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 01:32 PM   #57 (permalink)
PM Newbie
 
minirazor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: So Cal LA
Posts: 52
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Is there a stroker crank available for the nsr50?? if there is does anybody know how many cc's a stroker crank and a 63cc kit will produce??

Last edited by minirazor; 09-28-2009 at 01:39 PM.
minirazor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 01:47 PM   #58 (permalink)
1st Gear Member
 
reefmuncher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 122
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by minirazor View Post
Is there a stroker crank available for the nsr50?? if there is does anybody know how many cc's a stroker crank and a 63cc kit will produce??
That'll depend on the length of the stroke!!

I've not seen one, but sure if you pay someone enough money and they'll do it for you!!
reefmuncher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 01:56 PM   #59 (permalink)
Mod formerly known as Culdesac
 
NCNSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Garden City, N.Y.
Posts: 945
My Mood: Cynical
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by minirazor View Post
Is there a stroker crank available for the nsr50?? if there is does anybody know how many cc's a stroker crank and a 63cc kit will produce??
The cost benefit ratio isnt there,You would gain so little it is a waste....Racerxxx221(Richie)was already all over that idea...And trust me after working these motors for all there worth for over 25years if it could be done the Japanese would have done it long ago.On another note i just got off the phone with Malossi they are sending me a 47mm piston that i found with a 12mm wrist pin that might be just the ticket to bump the Malossi cylinder to 72cc.Currently the cylinder comes with a 45.5mm/67.3cc, I had it bored for 46.3mm/69.6cc, 47mm is 71.8cc the same as the Autoboy

Last edited by NCNSR; 09-28-2009 at 07:33 PM.
NCNSR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2009, 02:20 PM   #60 (permalink)
PM Newbie
 
minirazor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: So Cal LA
Posts: 52
Re: Malossi/Autoboy BBK Comparison

Quote:
Originally Posted by NCNSR View Post
The cost benefit ratio isnt there,You would gain so little it is a waste....Racerxxx221(Richie)was already all over that idea...And trust me after working these motors for all there worth for over 25years if it could be done the Japanese would have done it long ago.On another note i just got off the phone with Malossi they are sending me a 47mm piston that i found with a 12mm wrist pin that might be just the ticket to bump the Malossi cylinder to 72cc.Currently the cylinder comes with a 45.5/67.3cc, I had it bored for 46.3/69.8cc, 47mm is 71.8 the same as the Autoboy
Would't you rather leave the bore size at 46.3, run it for a while then bore it out to 47 ? it seems like the 47mm bore is the max you will be able to go with that cylinder. gods forbidden something goes wrong in the first run with the 71.8cc cylinder. just my .02
minirazor is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
bbk, comparison, malossi or autoboy



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
PlanetMinis

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46