Go Back   Planet Minis > Forum > General Talk > Roost Area

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-03-2009, 12:40 PM   #61 (permalink)
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Connecticut.
Posts: 1,550
Re: Engine Tech Build Project

outer rotor is basically a scaled down stock stator & flywheel. the inner rotor kit has nothing inside the flywheel, just the pickup on the outside if I'm not mistaken.
s_10onbagz is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 09-03-2009, 01:18 PM   #62 (permalink)
"High Speed Record Guy"
 
arlindsay1992's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 4,369
Re: Engine Tech Build Project

Outer rotor: Rotor with magnets is outside the ignition coils.
Inner rotor: Rotor with magnets is inside the ignition coils.

Stock flywheel would be classified as an outer rotor.
arlindsay1992 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2009, 11:16 PM   #63 (permalink)
Got Un-disappeared
 
cyclerider57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kansas
Posts: 4,321
My Mood: Paranoid
Re: Engine Tech Build Project

I don't plan on dumping the idea of doing a build as I've already got a bunch going that would work. The idea of creating it specifically for this forum would be dropped. I'd basically turn it into a build thread just showing pictures and information on the build. I just won't be going out of my way to stir up technical information. I'll still post about the build and answer questions about it.

I'd love to do a big bore de-stroke 88 but won't for a few reasons. I am already designing an engine with 57mm bore x 35.25mm stroke but it is a v4 so will be 360cc. The next reason is based on testing and analysis. A stock stroke 88 has such a short stroke already that I am not limited by piston speed when I try to increase rpm. The only major advantage going to a 57mm bore would have on one of these as an 88 would be potential for more valve area (there are of course many other advantages and disadvantages for each, IE: 57mm bore wouldn't shroud the backside of the valves as much). I wouldn't be able to utilize the flow area advantage without running my 4v head designed for 57mm bore considering I have a superhead +R that I worked over with 32mm/26mm valves (yes, for a 54mm bore crf50). Both a long and short stroke 88 would have similar performance because the normal limitations aren't there (within a few tenths of a hp since rpms would be similar on each and the others tend to even out). Even at 18,000 rpm (won't be going to that), I wouldn't be pushing the piston speed to high on the stock stroke. We will see what happens.
__________________
The wise understand by themselves; fools follow the reports of others. Goodness speaks in a whisper, evil shouts. -Tibetan Proverb

Last edited by cyclerider57; 09-03-2009 at 11:47 PM.
cyclerider57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2009, 01:51 AM   #64 (permalink)
3rd Gear Member
 
50rider340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 3,083
My Mood: Cool
Re: Engine Tech Build Project

I understand where you were going with this thread as planetminis has lost a lot of its tech info. Well in depth info. Checking the site everyday usually the same questions always being asked ex. What knock off bike should i buy. YX kick start broke. you know where im going with that. I do remember back 2-3 years ago, you and a few others were always posting up there ideas and photos of builds. Not just out of the box. You were always changing the valves guides ports valve stem diameter etc. And probably so much more that you were leaving out. I miss those days of reading those. I think you posting photos and your ideas may stir up more interests that your looking for.

Just tossing this out there what is your thoughts about boosting these little motors? A waste of time? Done correctly could go somewhere? Obviously for street use. Ebay has those really tiny turbos that i always want to drop the coin on for hahas.
50rider340 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2009, 02:46 AM   #65 (permalink)
2nd Gear Member
 
z50 chopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nanaimo, BC, Canada
Posts: 504
My Mood: Lurking
Re: Engine Tech Build Project

I have seen those turbos too, though it is a fun thought I do not think it would be practical and I haven't seen one recomended for anything smaller than 200cc engines.
So you could get too much boost and end up damaging your engine, I'll let your imagination run with that.
z50 chopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 02:00 AM   #66 (permalink)
Got Un-disappeared
 
cyclerider57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kansas
Posts: 4,321
My Mood: Paranoid
Re: Engine Tech Build Project

Quote:
Originally Posted by 50rider340 View Post
I understand where you were going with this thread as planetminis has lost a lot of its tech info. Well in depth info. Checking the site everyday usually the same questions always being asked ex. What knock off bike should i buy. YX kick start broke. you know where im going with that. I do remember back 2-3 years ago, you and a few others were always posting up there ideas and photos of builds. Not just out of the box. You were always changing the valves guides ports valve stem diameter etc. And probably so much more that you were leaving out. I miss those days of reading those. I think you posting photos and your ideas may stir up more interests that your looking for.

Just tossing this out there what is your thoughts about boosting these little motors? A waste of time? Done correctly could go somewhere? Obviously for street use. Ebay has those really tiny turbos that i always want to drop the coin on for hahas.
All I can say with absolute certainty is that I have never done it. Personally, I don't think it would be any benefit unless you designed a super/turbo specifically for one of these true minis. I think the parasitic loses would outweigh the benefits especially if you didn't create your own fuel injection system too. You would be creating more carburetion and charge quality problems then it would be worth. Without designing your own you probably wouldn't be able to create a 1+bar intake pressure consistently. Pressure is directly related to velocity and volume. These engines have virtually no volume so it would take a specific design to be able to capture and create any pressure to actually make more power past what the design absorbs to even turn.
__________________
The wise understand by themselves; fools follow the reports of others. Goodness speaks in a whisper, evil shouts. -Tibetan Proverb
cyclerider57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 11:49 PM   #67 (permalink)
Got Un-disappeared
 
cyclerider57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kansas
Posts: 4,321
My Mood: Paranoid
Re: Engine Tech Build Project

Let it begin...

http://www.planetminis.com/f8/high-h...ml#post1392888
__________________
The wise understand by themselves; fools follow the reports of others. Goodness speaks in a whisper, evil shouts. -Tibetan Proverb
cyclerider57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2009, 11:14 AM   #68 (permalink)
1st Gear Member
 
way2fast4u7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Grande Prairie
Posts: 106
My Mood: Tired
Re: Engine Tech Build Project

Quote:
Originally Posted by schofell84 View Post
how about you just get me a job where i can learn all that good stuff

as far as all that technical stuff, does anyone have any really good books they'd like to suggest? i've accumulated a few, but amazon isnt very helpful in deciding what to buy.



ooh oooh ooh! 3valve-er!! kurlon had some very interesting numbers on his website a while ago.
don't know if you will see this as it is so far after when you posted the original post. But, I found a magazine out of europe, called "Racecar Engineering" and it shares a lot of different ideas in engine building. Moreso on the F1 front, but still a lot of info transfers over. A couple months ago they had an issue with exhaust building basically just to get a guy in the know. also had dynamic analysis of chain drive systems. just a thought
way2fast4u7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2009, 01:07 PM   #69 (permalink)
2nd Gear Member
 
schofell84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ogdensburg
Posts: 278
Re: Engine Tech Build Project

Quote:
Originally Posted by way2fast4u7 View Post
don't know if you will see this as it is so far after when you posted the original post. But, I found a magazine out of europe, called "Racecar Engineering" and it shares a lot of different ideas in engine building. Moreso on the F1 front, but still a lot of info transfers over. A couple months ago they had an issue with exhaust building basically just to get a guy in the know. also had dynamic analysis of chain drive systems. just a thought
excellent, i wonder what a subscription costs ... is it available in the states?

edit: 107 bucks a year. wowzers.

Last edited by schofell84; 09-06-2009 at 01:16 PM.
schofell84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2009, 06:21 PM   #70 (permalink)
3rd Gear Member
 
50rider340's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 3,083
My Mood: Cool
Re: Engine Tech Build Project

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyclerider57 View Post
All I can say with absolute certainty is that I have never done it. Personally, I don't think it would be any benefit unless you designed a super/turbo specifically for one of these true minis. I think the parasitic loses would outweigh the benefits especially if you didn't create your own fuel injection system too. You would be creating more carburetion and charge quality problems then it would be worth. Without designing your own you probably wouldn't be able to create a 1+bar intake pressure consistently. Pressure is directly related to velocity and volume. These engines have virtually no volume so it would take a specific design to be able to capture and create any pressure to actually make more power past what the design absorbs to even turn.
That was my take on the turbo idea too. Because most people that have tried it have come up short with it actually being beneficial. The only thing I have seen work is the aisin AMR500 supercharger on a 50cc motor. There's a website with a guy reporting insane HP gain out of just 50cc's on a cafe bike. AMR500s are not cheap that's the only problem.

If I end up trying to do the turbo build I'll post it up. I wouldn't run a blow through set up. I would go with a draw through because running into issues with float bowl pressure would just be a huge headache, and fuel injection would be way out of the price range. I have seen draw through turbo set ups on a couple rotary motors that ran efficient so it is possible.

By volume your talkin about combustion chamber, or intake and exhaust ports?
50rider340 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
build, engine, project, tech



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
PlanetMinis

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46