| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| 1st Gear Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Houston, tx lafayette, la every other wknd
Posts: 243
| CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head
I was wondering what was the base/average CFM with the TB V2 head v.s the CFM for the yx 160 head in stock form or lightly ported?
|
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| 3rd Gear Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: SC Michigan
Posts: 3,626
| Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head
I have never heard anyone using a flowbench on these heads here. I would like to know myself.
|
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Pitster Employee Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: USA
Posts: 1,887
| Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head
the secret of the v2 vs stock is really not as much the valve size and or port size and it is the fact that it has a roller cam v2 profile that is virtually square compared to the little triangled shap of the flat tappet cam of the YX, that is where the big power gains are. the v2 pops the valve open , holds it there and pops it shut, the yx gradually opens and peaks then gradually closes the valves. basically alot ,more in and out, sure porting will help, but with both ported similar, the V2 (+R) will aways outshine the YX. Last edited by Matified; 11-04-2009 at 05:32 PM. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| 3rd Gear Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: SC Michigan
Posts: 3,626
| Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head
which equals more duration......opening sooner....closing later all at a faster rate. Just another reason until that 4V head is made into a roller rocker the V2 will out perform it. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| 1st Gear Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Dixon Mo
Posts: 131
My Mood: | Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head
I want to put one on my yx 160. What will it give me?? More top end??
|
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Super Moderator Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Windham, ME
Posts: 8,301
| Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head Yeah, but multivalve setups flow more at initial lift... so that 4v head may be able to beat the V2's longer peak lift duration by better flow when not at peak lift.
|
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Advertiser Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Flint MI
Posts: 11,002
My Mood: | Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head
If the port shape wasn't poop, and the valves shrouded to reduce their theoretical low-lift curtain area advantage
__________________ If it has my name on it I did it;) FirepowerMinis.com Custom FPM parts and engines. Parts and service for all makes. Honda Trail Bikes parts and accessories. Pitster/Piranha/Thumpstar bikes, parts, engines and accessories. Last edited by firepower354; 11-05-2009 at 06:03 AM. |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Advertiser Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,789
My Mood: | Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head Quote:
let me know if we can help
__________________ T Bolt USA ALL top Pitbikes ,Engines and Parts for Pitbikes & Minis Website Contact THECRKID@TBOLTUSA.COM or Call 215-630-3554 | |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Advertiser Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Flint MI
Posts: 11,002
My Mood: | Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head Quote:
My flowbench still isn't finished...
__________________ If it has my name on it I did it;) FirepowerMinis.com Custom FPM parts and engines. Parts and service for all makes. Honda Trail Bikes parts and accessories. Pitster/Piranha/Thumpstar bikes, parts, engines and accessories. Last edited by firepower354; 11-05-2009 at 06:03 AM. | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| 3rd Gear Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: SC Michigan
Posts: 3,626
| Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head Quote:
If you need anything tcr0148 check out www.firepowerminis.com for all your high performance parts. | |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) | |
| 1st Gear Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Houston, tx lafayette, la every other wknd
Posts: 243
| Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head Quote:
PM already sent to Terry on behalf of the 192cc w/full skirt | |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| 3rd Gear Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: SC Michigan
Posts: 3,626
| Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head
IMO....there is potential for the YX 4V head yes but it will take work to get it on par with the stock out of the box TB V2. Maybe this time next year the roller rocker V4 from TB will be all the rage.. |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) | |
| 1st Gear Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Houston, tx lafayette, la every other wknd
Posts: 243
| Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Super Moderator Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Windham, ME
Posts: 8,301
| Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head I think I can do the combustion chamber work, and I've got access to a dyno... I'm lacking base engines, cash and time though. :P I know nada on porting, will need help there too. So, all I've got at the moment is paper comparisons.
|
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| 3rd Gear Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: ca
Posts: 5,519
My Mood: | Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head |
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) |
| PM Newbie Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 39
My Mood: | Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head
here you go. measured at 28" yx head. lift in out 2mm 30 26 cfm 4 60 53 6 69 54 7 70 54 8 73 ... 9 73(staling) tb head 2mm 31 32cfm 3 46 47 4 63 57 5 64 64 6 92 70 7 94 72 8 96 74 9 99 75 mats |
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| 2nd Gear Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Ogdensburg
Posts: 278
| Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head
wow. huge differences in high lift. same cam? or just same lift? |
| | |
| | #18 (permalink) |
| PM Newbie Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 39
My Mood: | Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head
there are a big differense in porting and porting so cant realy just put in some numbers.. depending on what has been done. mats |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| cfm, head, yx160 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| |