Go Back   Planet Minis > Forum > General Talk > Chinese/Import Minis - General Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-04-2009, 02:41 PM   #1 (permalink)
1st Gear Member
 
tcr0148's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, tx lafayette, la every other wknd
Posts: 243
CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

I was wondering what was the base/average CFM with the TB V2 head v.s the CFM for the yx 160 head in stock form or lightly ported?
tcr0148 is offline   Reply With Quote

Old 11-04-2009, 02:50 PM   #2 (permalink)
3rd Gear Member
 
Blackwoodz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SC Michigan
Posts: 3,626
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

I have never heard anyone using a flowbench on these heads here. I would like to know myself.
Blackwoodz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 05:27 PM   #3 (permalink)
Pitster Employee
 
Matified's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,887
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

the secret of the v2 vs stock is really not as much the valve size and or port size and it is the fact that it has a roller cam v2 profile that is virtually square compared to the little triangled shap of the flat tappet cam of the YX, that is where the big power gains are.
the v2 pops the valve open , holds it there and pops it shut, the yx gradually opens and peaks then gradually closes the valves.

basically alot ,more in and out, sure porting will help, but with both ported similar, the V2 (+R) will aways outshine the YX.

Last edited by Matified; 11-04-2009 at 05:32 PM.
Matified is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 05:45 PM   #4 (permalink)
3rd Gear Member
 
Blackwoodz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SC Michigan
Posts: 3,626
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

which equals more duration......opening sooner....closing later all at a faster rate.
Just another reason until that 4V head is made into a roller rocker the V2 will out perform it.
Blackwoodz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 09:16 PM   #5 (permalink)
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Dixon Mo
Posts: 131
My Mood: Amused
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

I want to put one on my yx 160. What will it give me?? More top end??
T719mx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 09:34 PM   #6 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Windham, ME
Posts: 8,301
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackwoodz View Post
which equals more duration......opening sooner....closing later all at a faster rate.
Just another reason until that 4V head is made into a roller rocker the V2 will out perform it.
Yeah, but multivalve setups flow more at initial lift... so that 4v head may be able to beat the V2's longer peak lift duration by better flow when not at peak lift.
Kurlon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 10:25 PM   #7 (permalink)
Advertiser
 
firepower354's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Flint MI
Posts: 11,002
My Mood: Amused
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

If the port shape wasn't poop, and the valves shrouded to reduce their theoretical low-lift curtain area advantage
__________________
If it has my name on it I did it;)

FirepowerMinis.com
Custom FPM parts and engines.
Parts and service for all makes.
Honda Trail Bikes parts and accessories.
Pitster/Piranha/Thumpstar bikes, parts, engines and accessories.

Last edited by firepower354; 11-05-2009 at 06:03 AM.
firepower354 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2009, 11:40 PM   #8 (permalink)
Advertiser
 
T Bolt USA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,789
My Mood: Cool
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

Quote:
Originally Posted by T719mx View Post
I want to put one on my yx 160. What will it give me?? More top end??
3-4 hp over stock , v2 rips
let me know if we can help
__________________
T Bolt USA
ALL top Pitbikes ,Engines and Parts for Pitbikes & Minis
Website
Contact THECRKID@TBOLTUSA.COM or Call 215-630-3554
T Bolt USA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 05:59 AM   #9 (permalink)
Advertiser
 
firepower354's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Flint MI
Posts: 11,002
My Mood: Amused
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

Quote:
Originally Posted by T719mx View Post
I want to put one on my yx 160. What will it give me?? More top end??
You'll go faster due to a lighter wallet, with a 4V, unless porting is done, and done right. I'm digging in to one next week, and will get some measurements and info before & after. It's clear already, that along with the valves needing unshrouded, the valve job needs work. That's a major key to low-lift flow. I'll try 3 and 5 angle setups, and maybe even the full-radius cutter we use on the big stuff.
My flowbench still isn't finished...
__________________
If it has my name on it I did it;)

FirepowerMinis.com
Custom FPM parts and engines.
Parts and service for all makes.
Honda Trail Bikes parts and accessories.
Pitster/Piranha/Thumpstar bikes, parts, engines and accessories.

Last edited by firepower354; 11-05-2009 at 06:03 AM.
firepower354 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 07:12 AM   #10 (permalink)
3rd Gear Member
 
Blackwoodz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SC Michigan
Posts: 3,626
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurlon View Post
Yeah, but multivalve setups flow more at initial lift... so that 4v head may be able to beat the V2's longer peak lift duration by better flow when not at peak lift.
sounds good on paper...why not prove it in a real life flowbench dyno run. OBTW with the 4v unless you grind your own cams not alot of options right now.

If you need anything tcr0148 check out www.firepowerminis.com for all your high performance parts.
Blackwoodz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 09:00 AM   #11 (permalink)
1st Gear Member
 
tcr0148's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, tx lafayette, la every other wknd
Posts: 243
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurlon View Post
Yeah, but multivalve setups flow more at initial lift... so that 4v head may be able to beat the V2's longer peak lift duration by better flow when not at peak lift.
The bottom line is that the TB V2 head's dynamics (chamber shape, roller rockers, piston shape) is much more efficient, right? And what I mean by efficient, is that the V2 will come closer to maximizing the YX160's horsepower and torque potential .......given that the air to fuel is equally met.

PM already sent to Terry on behalf of the 192cc w/full skirt
tcr0148 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 09:06 AM   #12 (permalink)
3rd Gear Member
 
Blackwoodz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SC Michigan
Posts: 3,626
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

IMO....there is potential for the YX 4V head yes but it will take work to get it on par with the stock out of the box TB V2. Maybe this time next year the roller rocker V4 from TB will be all the rage..
Blackwoodz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 09:20 AM   #13 (permalink)
1st Gear Member
 
tcr0148's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, tx lafayette, la every other wknd
Posts: 243
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

Quote:
Originally Posted by firepower354 View Post
You'll go faster due to a lighter wallet, with a 4V, unless porting is done, and done right. I'm digging in to one next week, and will get some measurements and info before & after. It's clear already, that along with the valves needing unshrouded, the valve job needs work. That's a major key to low-lift flow. I'll try 3 and 5 angle setups, and maybe even the full-radius cutter we use on the big stuff.
My flowbench still isn't finished...
I think for obvious reason that a head with 4 valves would flow alot more "efficient" air. With this being said, won't the massive increase in valve area (the extra valves) reduce the port velocity drastically in the chamber.......which will then decrease low end torque and horsepower?????? I'm guessing that is why there are DOHC in most 4 valve applications. In other words we are making do with the technology that we have thus far and V2 is where its at for NOW at least
tcr0148 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 09:24 AM   #14 (permalink)
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Windham, ME
Posts: 8,301
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackwoodz View Post
sounds good on paper...why not prove it in a real life flowbench dyno run. OBTW with the 4v unless you grind your own cams not alot of options right now.
I think I can do the combustion chamber work, and I've got access to a dyno... I'm lacking base engines, cash and time though. :P I know nada on porting, will need help there too. So, all I've got at the moment is paper comparisons.
Kurlon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 09:33 AM   #15 (permalink)
3rd Gear Member
 
Paxracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: ca
Posts: 5,519
My Mood: Breezy
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

Quote:
Originally Posted by tcr0148 View Post
I was wondering what was the base/average CFM with the TB V2 head v.s the CFM for the yx 160 head in stock form or lightly ported?
I will try to flow one for you next week.
Paxracing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 10:33 AM   #16 (permalink)
PM Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 39
My Mood: Fine
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

here you go.
measured at 28"

yx head.
lift in out
2mm 30 26 cfm
4 60 53
6 69 54
7 70 54
8 73 ...
9 73(staling)

tb head
2mm 31 32cfm
3 46 47
4 63 57
5 64 64
6 92 70
7 94 72
8 96 74
9 99 75


mats
teflonmats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 10:35 AM   #17 (permalink)
2nd Gear Member
 
schofell84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ogdensburg
Posts: 278
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

wow. huge differences in high lift.

same cam? or just same lift?
schofell84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 10:51 AM   #18 (permalink)
PM Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 39
My Mood: Fine
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

there are a big differense in porting and porting so cant realy just put in some
numbers..
depending on what has been done.

mats
teflonmats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 10:56 AM   #19 (permalink)
PM Newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 39
My Mood: Fine
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

Quote:
Originally Posted by schofell84 View Post
wow. huge differences in high lift.

same cam? or just same lift?
just lift.

mats
teflonmats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 11:04 AM   #20 (permalink)
2nd Gear Member
 
schofell84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ogdensburg
Posts: 278
Re: CFM V2 vs CFM yx160 head

so basically theres no point in running a cam with over .250" lift in a stock yx head? duration is key from what i'm seeing.
schofell84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
cfm, head, yx160



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
PlanetMinis

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46